PAGES

November 08, 2015

Destruction of cultural heritage in conflict zones: not just a Middle Eastern problem



While the destruction of ancient cultural heritage in places like Palmyra and Timbuktu have garnered the world's outrage, no such condemnation followed similar destruction in the conflicts that erupted on Europe's south-eastern flank following the break-up of the Soviet Union. However, the issue is now resurfacing both in the Balkans and Caucasus.

As recently reported by the Balkan Transitional Justice Initiative, Kosovo's efforts to become a member of UNESCO have rbecome a lightning rod for recriminations between Kosovo and Serbia over the destruction of cultural and religious monuments in both countries the 1990s. However, despite accusations on both sides of wilful destruction of monuments, local courts have - with very few exceptions - failed to prosecute those responsible. And in the Balkans more broadly, the tally is also said to include 1,200 mosques destroyed in Bosnia-Herzegovina and 2,440 buildings of cultural importance in Croatia.

Meanwhile, longstanding tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan surfaced this week at the UNESCO general session when Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian took the opportunity during his address to condemn the alleged destruction of medieval Armenian artifacts, including cross-stones and churches, in Armenia's Nakhijevan region. For his part, Azerbaijan's Ambassador to UNESCO, Anar Karimov, has condemned Armenia for much the same reason, citing for example the destruction of the ancient Aga-Dede mosque and cemetery in Amernia's Masis region.

While the accusations and counter-accusations are not in themselves likely to usher in greater protection for cultural heritage in conflict zones, the fact that the issue is being discussed at all is welcome, and hopefully over time a new international consensus can be reached.

No comments:

Post a Comment